×
underwater OR camera OR aqua OR shot OR review site:CameraHacker.com from www.camerahacker.com
The image quality is really crappy and it's not worth bothering with it unless you just want something to play with. The capture speed is very slow so you have ...
underwater OR camera OR aqua OR shot OR review site:CameraHacker.com from www.camerahacker.com
Sep 11, 2007 · This camera works satisfactorily and is very compact. I usually carry 4-5 of them in different colors in order to instantly ID pictures ...
May 9, 2007 · The camera takes really decent if not, nice pictures. I tried one out in the sun and the photos came out great. Almost as nice as my Kodak ...
Aug 3, 2007 · The Camera is ok for its money, but you need to change so many settings around in order to get good pictures, it doesnt capture good lighting, I ...
underwater OR camera OR aqua OR shot OR review site:CameraHacker.com from www.camerahacker.com
Feb 2, 2008 · Obviously photos taken in bright OUTDOOR LIGHT are best with this camera, but I also found lamp-lit indoor 3D photos to be low-grade fun. Neat, ...
underwater OR camera OR aqua OR shot OR review site:CameraHacker.com from www.camerahacker.com
Aug 27, 2005 · This camera sucks big time. The picture quality is horrible, especially when using flash indoors. I don't know how this company can get away ...
underwater OR camera OR aqua OR shot OR review site:CameraHacker.com from www.camerahacker.com
Jan 24, 2007 · The camera takes decent quality pictures and the previews on the back are a good resolution, its nothing to call home about but its not bad. I ...
underwater OR camera OR aqua OR shot OR review site:CameraHacker.com from www.camerahacker.com
Feb 25, 2007 · The camera surprised me. It took reasonably good quality pictures with the flash in very low light settings. It took better pictures with no ...
Excerpt: I have the DCP1 Ewa Marine housing and it's completely useless. The whole thing is a joke. The flashlight of my olympus C-180 is directly under the ...