×
Jan 24, 2007 · The camera takes decent quality pictures and the previews on the back are a good resolution, its nothing to call home about but its not bad. I ...
Should you be shopping for a $20 camera for a child, shame on you, but you'll get what you pay for here. No flash, no preview screen, viewfinder is way off, ...
Aug 3, 2007 · The Camera is ok for its money, but you need to change so many settings around in order to get good pictures, it doesnt capture good lighting, I ...
sakar OR digital OR camera OR review site:CameraHacker.com from www.camerahacker.com
Aug 27, 2005 · This camera sucks big time. The picture quality is horrible, especially when using flash indoors. I don't know how this company can get away ...
sakar OR digital OR camera OR review site:CameraHacker.com from www.camerahacker.com
Feb 25, 2007 · The camera surprised me. It took reasonably good quality pictures with the flash in very low light settings. It took better pictures with no ...
Dec 3, 2011 · Just bought this camera today. It had the instructions and disk and everything needed to run it. It took photos just fine (with proper lighting[ ...
sakar OR digital OR camera OR review site:CameraHacker.com from www.camerahacker.com
May 9, 2007 · The camera takes really decent if not, nice pictures. I tried one out in the sun and the photos came out great. Almost as nice as my Kodak ...
Jan 7, 2010 · I have a Sakar Digital Concepts 32490/32492 Digital Video Camera that was given to my daughter for Christmas. I inserted an SD card and it was ...
Most digital cameras that are cheap require alot of light for a great pic. This SAKAR 3.1 POS in alot of light make everything white.Low light it loses res and ...
sakar OR digital OR camera OR review site:CameraHacker.com from www.camerahacker.com
Despite the low resolution, the specification for this camera is not bad for its price. I picked it up at a local department store for less than twenty bucks.